← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

Silicon / germanium quantum-dot spins on the map bar: CMOS spin qubits

Silicon / germanium quantum-dot spins

architecture · spin_qd · 10 layers · 17 technologies counting alternates

Actors & goals

goals: G4 G7

Derived clocks

syndrome round
8.5 µs · limiter: readout · round of code_surface (d₂ = 4, d₁ = 2)
parts
gates 400 ns · transport 0 · 1Q 800 ns · readout 6.3 µs · reset 1.0 µs
measured cycle
~100 µs – 300 µs (readout-limited)
reaction time
floor 7.3 µs · no published measurement→operation loop
coherence
T1 9.5 s · T2 1.9 ms · ops per coherence 1.9e4
idle exposure per round
t_round/T2 = 4.5e−3 · measured idle error —
t_round = d₂·(t_2Q + t_move) + d₁·t_1Q + t_meas + t_reset — a sum of the round's phases, from the code node, the attributes and the standard records; the measured cycle is the check.

Relations within the architecture

→ dependencies · 20
QD spin is needed by Exchange gate (or an alternative)
Baseband electrical is needed by Exchange gate (or an alternative)
QD spin is needed by Exchange-only
QD spin is needed by Spin shuttling
QD spin is needed by Crossbar
CMOS 300 mm is needed by Cryo-CMOS
QD spin is needed by Spin-to-charge (or an alternative)
Static NN lattice is needed by Surface code (or an alternative)
CMOS 300 mm is the usual route for QD spin
Cryo-CMOS is needed by Cryo fan-out
QD spin is needed by Single spin (or an alternative)
Surface code is the usual route for MWPM / Blossom (or an alternative)
QD spin is needed by MW spin gates (or an alternative)
Cryo-CMOS is needed by Exchange gate (or an alternative)
Spin shuttling is needed by qLDPC (gross) (or an alternative)
Baseband electrical is needed by MW spin gates (or an alternative)
RT electronics + coax is needed by MW spin gates (or an alternative)
✕ conflicts · 3
qLDPC (gross) conflicts with Static NN lattice · open — no mitigation shown at scale
Crossbar conflicts with Exchange gate · open — no mitigation shown at scale
qLDPC (gross) conflicts with MWPM / Blossom · bypassed by choosing another technology in place of one of the two
⇄ alternatives · 5
Exchange-only alternative to Single spin

The architecture in the report (§8.3)

8.3.13 CMOS spin qubits — Silicon / germanium quantum-dot spins (spin_qd)

The idea. A Gate-defined quantum-dot spin (qd_spin) is a transistor-sized gate stack: printed by a 300 mm CMOS foundry (fab_cmos), entangled by a pulse on the barrier to its neighbour, the Exchange gate (g_exch), read by Spin-to-charge conversion (ro_s2c), and coherent 1.31 ms (Hahn echo) on foundry ²⁸Si [D][197]. The bet: dots uniform enough to share calibration, with control moved into the cryostat, scale like transistors. The price: a readout-limited clock, 8.5 µs derived [S] against ~100–300 µs as run [G] (§7.4), and reach only to neighbours unless spins move.

What it needs. Exchange requires the dots and baseband pulses: its strength depends exponentially on barrier voltage, and HRL puts ~80% of its CNOT error on control and calibration [D][190], [191]. Carrier, cryo-CMOS, conveyor and the Cryogenic signal fan-out all require the foundry; the fan-out also requires cryo-CMOS behind it: Intel's Pando Tree serves up to 64 qubit terminals at 10–20 mK from one signal and nine digital lines of Horse Ridge II, 0.156 lines per terminal [C][272]. The surface code requires a 2D nearest-neighbour lattice, which no register device shows; qLDPC conflicts with it (long-range checks), needing the conveyor that replaces it. Crossbar lines conflict with per-pair calibration. Five layers hold one technology; none links modules.

Where it stands. Nine machines, six devices (Table 8.3): demonstrated, the HRL exchange-only silicon spin processor (18 EO qubits from 54 quantum dots — Table 8.3's largest gate-capable device, level at 18 with Groove's, added to the register on 26 Sep 2026 [D][190], [191]), Tunnel Falls (Intel; 12 qubits [D][199]), the foundry 8-qubit array (Diraq/imec, exchange in one of four pairs [D][197]) and Groove Quantum's 18-qubit germanium spin processor (April 2026, no fidelities or paper [P][879]); deployed, RacQ (Equal1; sold as Bell-1 until May 2026, the name ESA still uses [C][237], [881]), installed at ESA's Frascati centre in July 2026 [C][881], and QM-One (Quantum Motion, count unpublished [200]); announced, the Diraq 8-qubit silicon spin quantum computer at Equinix Sydney and the Hitachi x Intel 18A spin programme; planned, Alloy Pioneer (Quobly), cloud access by end-2026 [R][201]. The best two-qubit error among devices, 3.0×10⁻³, is HRL's [D][190], [191]; Equal1's product page claims 99.3% (7.0×10⁻³) [C][273] where a press survey prints 98.4% [P][274]; no other machine publishes one. Off-register bests: 99.04–99.56% on foundry two-qubit devices [D][189]. HRL's bit-flip repetition code, error falling 4.7× from distance 3 to 5, sequenced from 4 K, is the architecture's only error-correction run [D][190], [191].

Exceptions and borrowings. No better-fitting architecture; two technology cells sit off the slots, HRL's error-detection code (code_detect) and RacQ's cryogenic decoder (dec_cryo), an alternate not yet run. Until 26 Sep 2026 the primaries described an absent machine — all eight rows used Single-spin (Loss–DiVincenzo) encoding, none Exchange-only encoding; HRL's device, now IBM's [204], is now the ninth row and the architecture's only carrier of its primary encoding, with its repetition code and parity decoder as Atlas gaps (∅G-repetition, ∅G-parity). The foundry 8-qubit array holds the only in-slot code cell, a roadmap qLDPC with shuttling as alternate (early stage), and carries 1.1×10⁻² from other devices at 1 K [D][194]. The on-die control of RacQ and QM-One is an Atlas gap (∅G-qsoc). Tunnel Falls mixes cryo-CMOS and room-temperature drive (hybrid); Equinix control is undisclosed. Only Tunnel Falls documents its fan-out; the cells of QM-One, RacQ and the Hitachi programme are inferred. Four drive single spins by ESR or EDSR, the Microwave / optical spin gates (g_mwspin) that layer 3 lists as the alternate; their gate cells name only the exchange gate. Borrowers: cryo-CMOS on five superconducting machines; the foundry on thirteen, eight ion traps.

The next test. By March 2028 (§5.2): a 300 mm array above 20 qubits with all-pairs two-qubit fidelity ≥ 99.5% and µs-class readout confirms; Diraq's 2029 target (150 k physical, 1 k logical [R][211], [212]) cut again demotes. If the Equinix system (due October 2026 [C][206]) and Alloy Pioneer reach 2028 without their own two-qubit error, the best number stays a vendor's.

What the builders say. Diraq argues from the foundry: its qubits are made like the chips in phones and laptops, a path to millions of qubits on one chip [C][861]. Quobly, making its chips on STMicroelectronics' 300 mm line, targets one million qubits by 2032, after cloud access to its first machine, Alloy Pioneer, by end-2026 [R][201]. Hitachi, with Intel and AIST, plans error-corrected prototypes of 100 qubits in fiscal 2028 and 1,000 in fiscal 2030 on Intel's 18A process [R][862]. HRL answers the wiring problem with a cryogenic CMOS controller that ran error correction on 18-qubit devices without room-temperature control [D][190], [191]. Equal1 fits a silicon-spin computer cooled to 0.3 K into one 19-inch rack [C][237]; Quantum Motion's QM-One takes three [C][200].

Machines of this architecture (register: 9, of them 6 devices, 6 gate-capable). Diraq — foundry 8-qubit array (demonstrated, 8); Diraq (with Equinix) — Diraq 8-qubit silicon spin quantum computer at Equinix Sydney (announced, 8); Equal1 — RacQ (Bell-1) (deployed, 6); Groove Quantum — Groove Quantum 18-qubit germanium spin processor (demonstrated, 18); HRL Laboratories (IBM since 26 Aug 2026) — HRL exchange-only silicon spin processor (18 EO qubits from 54 quantum dots) (demonstrated, 18); Hitachi + Intel K.K. + AIST (G-QuAT) — Hitachi x Intel 18A spin programme (announced, 100); Intel — Tunnel Falls (demonstrated, 12); Quantum Motion — QM-One (deployed); Quobly — Alloy Pioneer (Quobly) (planned, 15).

Cells outside the architecture's slots (7). Diraq 8-qubit silicon spin quantum computer at Equinix Sydney: L5 undisclosed where the architecture expects a technology; RacQ (Bell-1): L5 ∅G-qsoc (Atlas gap — quantum system-on-chip: qubits, control electronics and error-correction logic on one CMOS); RacQ (Bell-1): L8 Cryogenic / on-chip decoder (cryo-CMOS, SFQ) (dec_cryo, alternate borrowed from another architecture); HRL exchange-only silicon spin processor (18 EO qubits from 54 quantum dots): L7 Error-detection codes ([[4,2,2]], d=2 surface, iceberg, spacetime) (code_detect, primary off the architecture's slots); HRL exchange-only silicon spin processor (18 EO qubits from 54 quantum dots): L7 ∅G-repetition (Atlas gap — d=5 bit-flip repetition code on 7 exchange-only qubits, Λ5/3 = 4.7 over up to 200 rounds, ); HRL exchange-only silicon spin processor (18 EO qubits from 54 quantum dots): L8 ∅G-parity (Atlas gap — repetition-code syndromes interpreted after the run with a parity-check (majority) decoder); QM-One: L5 ∅G-qsoc (Atlas gap — cryo-CMOS integrated on the qubit die).