← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

Bosonic cavity qubits — cat and GKP on the map bar: Cat & GKP cavities

Bosonic cavity qubits — cat and GKP

architecture · cat · 10 layers · 14 technologies counting alternates

Actors & goals

goals: G3 G4

Derived clocks

syndrome round
1.4 µs · limiter: gates · round of code_bosonic (d₂ = 2)
parts
gates 1.0 µs · transport 0 · 1Q 0 · readout 282 ns · reset 160 ns
measured cycle
2.8 µs (Ocelot cycle)
reaction time
63 µs (published loop) · floor 1.3 µs
coherence
T1 26 ms · T2 34 ms (best) · ops per coherence 6.8e4
idle exposure per round
t_round/T2 = 4.2e−5 · measured idle error —
t_round = d₂·(t_2Q + t_move) + d₁·t_1Q + t_meas + t_reset — a sum of the round's phases, from the code node, the attributes and the standard records; the measured cycle is the check.

Relations within the architecture

→ dependencies · 14
Cavity mode is needed by Cat code
Cavity mode is needed by GKP grid (or an alternative)
Cavity mode is needed by Dispersive readout (or an alternative)
Cat code is needed by Bosonic concatenation (or an alternative)
GKP grid is needed by Bosonic concatenation (or an alternative)
3D cavities is needed by Cavity mode (or an alternative)
Bosonic concatenation is the usual route for MWPM / Blossom (or an alternative)
SC lithography is needed by Cavity mode (or an alternative)
✕ conflicts · 1
3D cavities conflicts with Static NN lattice · open — no mitigation shown at scale
⇄ alternatives · 4
Cat code alternative to GKP grid

The architecture in the report (§8.3)

8.3.2 Cat & GKP cavities — Bosonic cavity qubits — cat and GKP (cat)

The idea. The qubit is a microwave resonator mode, the Bosonic cavity mode (cavity), whose dominant error is photon loss. In the Cat-code encoding (biased noise) two-photon dissipation holds two coherent states apart: bit-flips fall exponentially with mean photon number n̄, phase-flips rise linearly, so a line of d cats, not a d × d patch, corrects the rest; lattice density is the price. The bet: photons buy the distance a lattice buys with qubits, if the bias survives the entangling gate. The alternate GKP grid encoding shares the hardware, not the bet: it corrects small displacements and passes up an analogue syndrome.

What it needs. The encoding requires two-photon dissipation on a mode, and Bosonic concatenation a biased or GKP inner qubit: the architecture rests on the phase-flip rate during a two-qubit gate. Every measured entangling gate is ancilla-mediated (g_bos), through a transmon that does not preserve the bias; the Bias-preserving cat–cat CNOT that would replace it is an empty slot with one simulated proposal (Jul 2026) [S][81]. Six layers offer one technology each. Lithographed modes replace 3D machined cavities, and the 3D branch conflicts with the lattice: centimetre-scale bodies cannot tile a dense 2D array (open [82]).

Where it stands. Seven machines, six devices (Table 8.3): Alice & Bob Boson 4, Helium 2 ("Galvanic Cat"), Helium (on-premise system) and the planned Graphene (2030) [R][828], [873] — the undated Lithium (48 cats) and Beryllium (250) chips stay unlisted until Alice & Bob dates them; AWS Ocelot; Nord Quantique single-mode GKP and Tesseract. The largest, Helium (18 cats), deployed June 2026 without logical data [C][87], [88]. Bit-flip times reach 430 s (Boson 4) and a preliminary 44-min mean (Helium 2) [C][77]; only Ocelot ran an outer code: repetition at 1.75% (d=3, n̄=1) and 1.65% (d=5, n̄=1.5) per 2.8 µs cycle, distance and photon number moving together, with CX phase-flip 9.6(4)×10⁻² against bit-flip 3.5(4)×10⁻³ [D][80]. Helium 2's 5.8×10⁻² is a single-qubit Z gate, not a two-qubit error, and Ocelot's 9.6×10⁻² is a phase-flip rate per error-correction cycle, not a gate error, so Table 8.3 shows no two-qubit error for the architecture [C][77]. Nord Quantique single-mode GKP: 8.1×10⁻³ logical error per round, SPAM below 10⁻³ at survival 0.24 × 0.39 [D][82].

Exceptions and borrowings. No off-slot cell, no better-fitting architecture; the shared absences, real-time decoder and interconnect, mark an early stage. The Nord Quantique pair: its decoder cell is an Atlas gap, ∅G-auton (stabilisation without classical feed-forward), so layer 8 is drawn too narrowly; its code cell reads Bosonic concatenation though neither runs an outer code, like Boson 4, a single cat with zero logical qubits on its roadmap [C][92]. GKP joins by hardware, not by the bias bet: for its idea the architecture is drawn too widely. Borrowers: Aurora (continuous-variable photonics) takes the GKP and code technologies; the dual-rail architecture's Aqumen Seeker, SUSTech biased-erasure cavity qubit and D-Wave gate-model dual-rail system take cavity and gates.

The next test. Two expectations to March 2028 (§5.2). First, Helium's roadmap rung, one logical qubit at 10⁻² [R][92]: phase-flip ≤ 10⁻² per cycle at n̄ ≈ 10 confirms; Helium still without logical data at end-2027 demotes. Second, a measured two-cat gate holding bit-flip time within 10× of idle; if 2028 opens with ancilla-mediated gates only, the 126,133- and 758-cat estimates, which assume 10⁻³ phase-flip per cycle, lose their premise [S][95], [96]. GKP owes a published GKP–GKP gate.

What the builders say. AWS chose cat qubits because they suppress bit flips in the hardware itself, as its Ocelot chip showed [D][827], and estimates that the approach cuts the cost of error correction by up to 90% [C][827]. Alice & Bob plans Graphene, 100 logical qubits for early industrial quantum advantage, by 2030 [R][828]; it reported bit-flip times above one hour, four times what that machine needs, before peer review [C][77], and built its on-premise Helium system to encode a first logical qubit in as few as 18 cat qubits [C][87], [88]. Nord Quantique builds the correction into each qubit, one cavity per logical qubit [C][829], and expects its first machines with more than 100 logical qubits by 2029 [R][830].

Machines of this architecture (register: 7, of them 6 devices, 6 gate-capable). Alice & Bob — Alice & Bob Graphene (planned, 2,000), Alice & Bob Helium (on-premise system) (deployed, 18), Alice & Bob Helium 2 ("Galvanic Cat") (demonstrated, 12), Alice & Bob Boson 4 (demonstrated, 1); Nord Quantique — Nord Quantique Tesseract (demonstrated, 2), Nord Quantique single-mode GKP (demonstrated, 1); AWS Center for Quantum Computing — AWS Ocelot (demonstrated, 9).

Cells outside the architecture's slots (2). Nord Quantique single-mode GKP: L8 ∅G-auton (Atlas gap — no classical decoder: autonomous, feed-forward-free stabilisation with analog closest-vect); Nord Quantique Tesseract: L8 ∅G-auton (Atlas gap — no classical decoder: autonomous stabilisation with heralded discard; no real-time decoder).