← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

Bias-preserving cat–cat CNOT g_catcnot

A direct entangling gate between two dissipative cat qubits that keeps the exponential bit-flip suppression intact through the interaction — theory only.

Bias-preserving cat–cat CNOT

g_catcnot · layer 3 Gate mechanism · empty slot — no technology yet

Required by every cat-qubit resource estimate; proposed since 2019 (Guillaud–Mirrahimi) and 2020 (Puri et al.), the first unitary scheme in July 2026; no demonstration.

Reading marks
∅ empty slot
Brief →

Key references

[81] Y. Ye et al., “Bias-preserving cat-cat CNOT gate via vacuum-conditional beam-splitter,” ar… · 2026
[80] H. Putterman et al., “Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic… · 2025
[412] Alice & Bob, “Roadmap,” Jun. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://alice-bob.com/roadmap/ · 2026

Design space — attributes

(a) carrier affinity
fabricated
(b) time · entangling
— · deterministic
(c) readout
—
(d) mobility
shared bus (motional / cavity)
(e) control
microwave @ room temperature
(f) error structure
biased
(g) manufacturing
superconducting lithography

Evaluation space — dated attributes

status → no experimental bias-preserving cat–cat CNOT
defines: error channel · 2026-07 · source

Standard records

2Q error under full-width parallel operation → not published · theory
No experimental bias-preserving cat-cat CNOT exists - only a July-2026 theory proposal - so no parallel error can be quoted · 2026-07 · source [S] ⓘ
crosstalk → not published · theory
No experimental bias-preserving cat-cat CNOT exists, so no crosstalk figure can exist · 2026-07 · source [S] ⓘ

Actors & goals — annotations

Used by 1 machine (1 primary · 0 alternate)

↗ its register card · paper / product / press: links that name the machine (attribution checked on 20 Sep 2026)

Pictures

Every picture carries the story of what it shows and its credit line.

Fig. 5 — Figure 5: Proof-of-principle implementation of a bias-preserving CX between 0-n Fock qubits. (a) Circuit decomposition. The CX can be implemented by…
A theory drawing in three panels: a circuit identity, step-by-step photon-number ladders paired with phase-space sketches, and a grey inset of recovery steps. It is Fig. 5 of "Dissipatively Stabilized 0-n Fock Qubits for Noise-Biased Quantum Computing" by Su Direkci, Simon Lieu, Kyungjoo Noh and Connor T. Hann. It proposes a CX between two cavity-based Fock qubits by swapping one into an auxiliary cat qubit, whose biased noise is preserved; green arrows are coherent operations, orange is engineered dissipation, red marks a pulse error and its recovery. “Fig. 5 — Figure 5: Proof-of-principle implementation of a bias-preserving CX between 0-n Fock qubits. (a) Circuit decomposition. The CX can be implemented by…” by Su Direkci, Simon Lieu, Kyungjoo Noh, Connor T. Hann, arxiv.org/abs/2608.25959, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Fig. 1 — Figure 1: Kerr-cat qubit encoding and 2D chip architecture. (a) The Bloch sphere for the Kerr-cat qubit is spanned by the cat states along the x-axi…
Seven-panel paper figure: theory drawings of the Kerr-cat qubit (Bloch sphere, double-well potential, photon-number distribution), a circuit diagram, and a real false-coloured optical micrograph of the square chip (1 mm scale bar) with SNAIL-based qubit pads, filters and meandering readout resonators. From the arXiv paper "High-Coherence Kerr-cat qubit in 2D architecture" by Ahmed Hajr and co-authors. It illustrates a superconducting cat-code qubit built from two opposite-phase coherent states, which makes bit flips rare; notice the Purcell filters that shield the qubit from its readout line. “Fig. 1 — Figure 1: Kerr-cat qubit encoding and 2D chip architecture. (a) The Bloch sphere for the Kerr-cat qubit is spanned by the cat states along the x-axis and the…” by Ahmed Hajr et al., arxiv.org/abs/2404.16697, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Fig. 7 — Figure 7: Overview of the scheme for concatenated biased-noise error correction introduced in [8]. The set of physical operations which have biased noise channe external image — opens at the source
A one-line typeset diagram: physical cat qubits with highly biased noise, their operations with the CX gate highlighted, are encoded by a repetition code and then a CSS code to reach universal fault-tolerant computation. It comes from arXiv 1905.00450 by Puri et al., 'Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits'. It shows why the bias-preserving controlled-NOT between cat qubits matters: it keeps noise biased so a repetition code can work. The gate itself is only named, not drawn.
g_catcnot · layer 3 Gate mechanism · centrality 8.2 · empty slot — no technology yet · updated 2026-09-04

Bias-preserving cat–cat CNOT

A direct entangling gate between two dissipative cat qubits that keeps the exponential bit-flip suppression intact through the interaction — theory only.

Verdict. Undemonstrated as of 2026-09-04; demote every cat-code qubit-count estimate if no two-cat gate shows measured bias preservation by 2028.

Key references

Λ = error-suppression factor per code-distance step; QBI = DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (Stage A concept → B R&D plan → C government V&V); G1–G7 = the report's goal classes (see Actors & economics).

Identity & lineage

An entangling gate acting directly between two dissipative cat qubits, no transmon ancilla in the middle, preserving the bit-flip/phase-flip asymmetry through the interaction. Every cat CX in hardware is cat–transmon; the cat–cat version is what cat-code resource estimates silently assume. The first coherent (unitary) scheme, a "vacuum-conditional beam-splitter", was posted 2026-07-24 by Ye et al. (AWS Center for Quantum Computing / Caltech) S[81]. Entangling is intended deterministic, gate time unmeasured; control is room-temperature microwave, bus connectivity.

Physics & limits

The difficulty is geometric: a cat CNOT rotates the target's coherent amplitude through π conditioned on the control, briefly leaving the stabilised two-lobe manifold; any non-adiabatic drive term then leaks population between lobes as plain bit-flips, no longer exponentially suppressed in photon number. Dissipative schemes pin the state but pay in gate-induced phase-flips. The unitary scheme drops the dissipator and claims logical memory below 10⁻⁶ from a distance-7 repetition code of 13 cats — from assumed lifetimes and nonlinearity precision, not measurement S[81]. The floor is structural: one residual bias-breaking term turns the exponential into a polynomial and takes the qubit-count case with it S[95].

Engineering state of the art

No cat–cat entangling gate exists in hardware as of 2026-09-04.

table
Date Figure Who Tag
2025-02 Cat–transmon CX at n̄ = 2: bit-flip 3.5(4)×10⁻³, phase-flip 9.6(4)×10⁻² → bias > 25 under the gate, > 30 idle AWS/Caltech (Ocelot) D[80]
2026-07 Unitary cat–cat CNOT proposed; <10⁻⁶ logical memory claimed, distance 7 / 13 cats Ye et al. S[81]
2030 2,000 cats → 100 logical at 10⁻⁶, requiring ≥13-min bit-flip during a CNOT Alice & Bob R[412]

The neighbour shows the budget's shape: Ocelot's 2.8 µs cycle moved logical error only from 1.75(2)% at distance 3 to 1.65(3)% at distance 5, because per-CX phase-flip is already ~10⁻¹ D[80].

The <10⁻⁶ logical-memory claim in [81] rests on assumed component lifetimes and nonlinearity precision, with no independent replication and no measured gate as of 2026-09-04. The roadmap page [412] attaches the "13 minutes" bit-flip requirement to the Graphene chip without saying whether it holds idle or under a gate. No experimental group has reported an attempt at a cat–cat entangling gate.

Manufacturing, materials & supply chain

No dedicated process: the gate reuses existing cavity bodies, junction lithography and room-temperature microwave stacks. Dropping the ancilla removes one transmon and readout chain per gate pair — Ocelot spends four ancillas on five cats — but adds a parametric tone per cat: lines per qubit are re-allocated, not reduced. At 10³ cats the wall is coax density and pump crosstalk in one dilution unit; at 10⁴–10⁶ it is the generic microwave wiring wall, no cryogenic-CMOS multiplexing of cat pump tones having been demonstrated.

Role in the stack

On the superconducting bosonic (cat/GKP) architecture; requires two cat-encoded qubits and provides nothing downstream until it exists. It replaces the ancilla-mediated bosonic CX, trading a non-bias-preserving transmon channel for an unproven direct interaction; not switching leaves the ancilla's bit-flips setting the code floor. It does not move the derived clock, a 1.44 µs round here inside the measured 2.8 µs cycle, set by CX plus dispersive ancilla readout D[80]. Verification: the sole evidence is a proposal — no replication, no hardware attempt, and <10⁻⁶ is a code-level projection, not a measured fidelity S[81].

Actors & economics

Who.
Organisation Role Country What exactly they do Evidence
AWS developer US Authored the unitary scheme; owns the cat CX hardware S[81]
Alice & Bob developer FR 2030 rung, 2,000 cats → 100 logical, presumes it R[412]
DARPA investor US Stage B funds Nord Quantique, not Alice & Bob fact

Money.
2025-01-28 · Alice & Bob · Series B · €100 M · — · closed fact
2026-05-22 · Alice & Bob · Series B extension · undisclosed · NVentures lead · closed C[88]
2026-06-17 · GENCI · buys first "Helium" · undisclosed · French HPC agency · closed C[87]
2025-11-06 · Nord Quantique · QBI Stage B · $5 M, up to $15 M · DARPA · announced G[65]

Market & supply chain. No supplier is specific to this gate; it reuses cat vendors' fabrication and pays for G3 alone.

IP & standards. No dated patent family specific to a bias-preserving cat–cat gate was found as of 2026-09-04.

Roadmaps & track record. AWS: promised 2026-07, no experimental date S[81]. Alice & Bob: promised on the live roadmap, for 2030 — Boson 4 (2024) and Helium (2026-06) landed, but every rung past Lithium (48 cats, 4 logical, 10⁻³) presumes this gate R[412].

Strategic reading. If measured, cat codes keep their qubit-count argument and surface-code transmon vendors lose; if still theory past 2028, dual-rail erasure takes the hardware-efficient slot.

Outlook & open questions

Confirm by 2028 if a measured two-cat gate holds bit-flip time within 10× of idle; demote if 2028 passes with only ancilla-mediated gates, since the 2030 rung and the 126,133-cat class of estimates lose their premise S[95]. Best case 2029: bias above 10³ under drive. Worst case: cat logic runs through ancillas indefinitely. Open: does the scheme survive junction-nonlinearity spread; can the gate be characterised without ancilla contamination; who attempts hardware first? Watch Ocelot follow-ups and the Lithium chip.

References
  1. [65] DARPA, “Stage B selection,” Nov. 6, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/quantum-benchmarking-initiative/stage-b-selection G
  2. [80] H. Putterman et al., “Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits,” Nature, vol. 638, no. 8052, pp. 927–934, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08642-7. D
  3. [81] Y. Ye et al., “Bias-preserving cat-cat CNOT gate via vacuum-conditional beam-splitter,” arXiv:2607.22852, Jul. 2026. S
  4. [87] N. Coppola, “Alice & Bob Unveils First Quantum System, Helium,” Alice & Bob, Jun. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://alice-bob.com/newsroom/alice-bob-unveils-first-quantum-system/ C
  5. [88] N. Coppola, “Alice & Bob announces Series B Extension,” Alice & Bob, May 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://alice-bob.com/newsroom/alice-bob-announces-series-b-extension/ C
  6. [95] É. Gouzien, D. Ruiz, F.-M. Le Régent, J. Guillaud, and N. Sangouard, “Performance Analysis of a Repetition Cat Code Architecture: Computing 256-bit Elliptic Curve Logarithm in 9 Hours with 126133 Cat Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 131, Art. no. 040602, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.040602. arXiv:2302.06639. S
  7. [412] Alice & Bob, “Roadmap,” Jun. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://alice-bob.com/roadmap/ R