← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

Aqumen Seeker

Quantum Circuits Inc. (acquired by D-Wave, Jan 2026)

Aqumen Seeker

Quantum Circuits Inc. (acquired by D-Wave, Jan 2026) · superconducting circuits · DEPLOYED (Nov 2024 (acquired 19 Jan 2026)) · 8 physical qubits · access: cloud service

Register profile — the machine's variant of its architecture

qubit type: dual-rail cavity qubit with erasure conversion; photon loss is heralded
gate mechanism: native sqrt(X), Z, CZ; ~500 ns CZ
connectivity: planar
control: room-temperature control; Real-Time Control Flow (mid-circuit measurement, conditional branching, qubit reuse, fast feedback)
control placement: room-temp
readout: three-outcome readout 0 / 1 / * exposed to the user; erasure detection efficiency >90%
gate evidence: a benchmark paper with its protocol
codes: dual_rail
flags: no code named

Technologies by layer — the machine's cell per layer

1 Qubit carrier
Bosonic cavity mode · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (dual-rail pairs of 3D λ/4 coaxial cavities) ✅
dual-rail cavity qubit: 8 qubits = 16 superconducting microwave resonators, photon loss heralded; T1 > 1 ms (2024)
2 Encoding
Dual-rail (erasure) encoding · primary ▣ Fig. 1a,c (dual-rail cavity pairs; photon population per basis state) ✅
one photon shared between two cavities per qubit; loss leaves the codespace as heralded erasure, ~0.5% erasure per CZ (Aug 2026)
3 Gate mechanism
Ancilla-mediated bosonic gates (cat CX, dual-rail CZ, beamsplitter) · primary ▣ Fig. 1b (SWS CZ gate sequence via flux-pumped SQUID coupler); §The SWS CZ gate; Fig. 2 ✅
native √X, Z, CZ; ~500 ns CZ, post-selected infidelity 2.9×10⁻⁴, ~0.5% erasure/gate, bit-flip ~1e-6 (Nature, Aug 2026)
4 Connectivity / transport
Static nearest-neighbour lattice · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (middle SQUID transmon coupler between two dual-rail qubits) ✅
planar nearest-neighbour coupling, degree 4 (register); 8 dual-rail qubits
5 Control
Room-temperature electronics + per-qubit coax/flex · primary ▤ 🔎
room-temperature control; Real-Time Control Flow: mid-circuit measurement, conditional branching, qubit reuse, fast feedback
6 Readout
Mid-circuit erasure check · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (per-cavity SPAM transmon + readout resonator); Fig. 2c, Fig. 3a (erasure fraction) ✅
three-outcome readout 0 / 1 / * exposed to the user; erasure detection efficiency >90% (2024)
Dispersive microwave readout (+TWPA, Purcell) · alternate ▣ Fig. 1a (readout resonator per cavity for SPAM) 🔎
three-outcome readout 0 / 1 / * exposed to the user; erasure detection efficiency >90%
7 Code
Erasure-adapted codes · primary ▤ Methods: QEC benefits of structured noise; leakage propagation and delayed erasure checks in a dual-rail surface code; Fig. 4 🔎
dual_rail hardware erasure detection with error-detected gates; no code demonstrated (L1); logical qubit from 5 dual-rail qubits claimed
8 Decoder
— none — nothing in this layer ▤ 🔎
no decoder published; no real-time decoding path (register)
9 Interconnect
Multi-chip modules / l-couplers (same cryostat) · primary ▤ 🔎
multi-chip superconducting packaging with local cryogenic control claimed (D-Wave), no numbers published
10 Manufacturing
3D machined superconducting cavities · primary ◌ 🔎
superconducting microwave cavities, two per dual-rail qubit (16 resonators for 8 qubits)
Superconducting-qubit lithography (Al/AlOx/Al junctions, Nb wiring, 300 mm) · alternate ◌ 🔎
Superconducting-qubit lithography (Nb/Al JJ, 300 mm) — IBM Albany 300 mm / Anderon foundry; Google Santa Barbara; Rigetti ABAA trimming (97.4% frequency-targeting success); OQC 500-qubit wafer-scale…

Standard records

2Q error under full-width parallel operation → 2.90e-4 · best-of-line (post-selected CZ infidelity; erasure ~5e-3 per gate, bit-flip ~1e-6)
Aug 2026 · source
QND fidelity / survival → 0.9 · best (erasure detection efficiency)
2024 · source
T1 relaxation → 1.0 ms · best
2024 · source
evidence: ✅ 5 / 12