← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

Ground–Rydberg analogue qubit enc_gr

A two-level qubit formed by an atomic ground state |g⟩ and a Rydberg state |r⟩, driven globally under an Ising-type Hamiltonian: the computational basis of analogue Rydberg simulators, not an error-suppressing code.

Ground–Rydberg analogue qubit

enc_gr · layer 2 Encoding · demonstrated · since 2017

The two computational states are a ground level and a Rydberg level: the native encoding of an analogue Rydberg machine, whose limit is the Rydberg lifetime (~100 µs), not hyperfine coherence.

Brief →

Key references

[262] J. Wurtz et al., “Aquila: QuEra's 256-qubit neutral-atom quantum computer,” arXiv:2306.117… · 2023
[384] H. Bernien et al., “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,” Nature, vo… · 2017
[385] L. Henriet et al., “Quantum computing with neutral atoms,” Quantum, vol. 4, Art. no. 327, … · 2020
[389] S. de Léséleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, “Analysis of imperfec… · 2018
[388] H. Levine et al., “High-fidelity control and entanglement of Rydberg-atom qubits,” Phys. R… · 2018

Design space — attributes

(a) carrier affinity
natural
(b) time · entangling
—
(c) readout
—
(d) mobility
—
(e) control
—
(f) error structure
loss (erasure), coherent / calibration
(g) manufacturing
—

Evaluation space — dated attributes

no dated attribute

Coherence is bounded by the Rydberg lifetime and laser phase noise; there is no shelved memory.

Standard records

T2 coherence (echo/DD) → 11 µs · typical
Aquila (QuEra): T2* 5.8 µs, T2 with echo 11.4 µs on the ground–Rydberg qubit; analog programs capped at 4 µs · 2023-06 · source [C] ⓘ
T2 coherence (echo/DD) → 32 µs · best
Harvard/MIT (2018): T2* 4.5(1) µs, spin-echo T2 32(6) µs on a ground–Rydberg atom qubit · 2018-09 · source [D]

Actors & goals — annotations

Neutral-atom analogue simulator (Rydberg arrays, lattice gases) — QuEra (Aquila), Pasqal (Fresnel; Orion in analogue mode), ICFO (QUIONE) · G1

Edges

needs: Alkali atom (Rb/Cs) in optical tweezers°, Alkaline-earth(-like) atom (Yb/Sr) — erasure-native°
needed by: Analogue Rydberg Hamiltonian evolution
alternatives: Hyperfine / clock-state qubit
° one of several that would do · the usual route, not a strict need

Used by 3 machines (2 primary · 1 alternate)

↗ its register card · paper / product / press: links that name the machine (attribution checked on 20 Sep 2026)

Pictures

Every picture carries the story of what it shows and its credit line.

Fig. 1 — Fig. 1: Illustrations of kinetically constrained qubit dynamics in the PXP model and its experimental realisation.a The blue and red curves display…
A three-part figure from a Rydberg-atom array experiment. Panel (a) plots, for each atom of a chain, how a spin observable oscillates in time under the constrained 'PXP' model, comparing an alternating start with one whose central spin is flipped; the difference spreads inside a light cone. Panel (b) draws the atom chain lit by global 780 nm and 480 nm Raman beams, with addressing lasers and a local perturbation; panel (c) is the level scheme in which the ground state is spin-down and the Rydberg state spin-up. From Nature Communications (2026) by De-Sheng Xiang, Lin Li and co-authors. It shows the ground–Rydberg analog qubit at work. “Fig. 1 — Fig. 1: Illustrations of kinetically constrained qubit dynamics in the PXP model and its experimental realisation.a The blue and red curves display the…” by Xiang et al., www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73520-3, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Fig. 1 — Figure 1: Post-quench dynamics in the 2D TFIM. (A) We consider quantum simulations of post-quench dynamics described by the 2D TFIM. The qubits are…
Four-part figure on quench dynamics of a two-dimensional transverse-field Ising magnet simulated with Rydberg atoms. Panel B carries the qubit: a ground level |↓⟩ and a Rydberg level |↑⟩ driven by a global Rabi frequency Ω and detuning δ, beside a small picture of a Pasqal 'Neutral atom QPU' cabinet and a fluorescence image of the square atom array; panels A, C and D give spin-lattice sketches, a phase diagram and measured magnetisation. It is Fig. 1 of arXiv 2608.07178 by T. Mendes-Santos and co-authors (256-qubit processor). It shows how an analog Rydberg machine encodes each qubit in a ground and a Rydberg level. “Fig. 1 — Figure 1: Post-quench dynamics in the 2D TFIM. (A) We consider quantum simulations of post-quench dynamics described by the 2D TFIM. The qubits are initialized…” by Tiago Mendes-Santos et al., arxiv.org/abs/2608.07178, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Extended Data Fig. 2 — Extended Data Fig. 2 Rydberg lifetime.a, Pseudo-level diagram of the Rydberg dynamics and associated decay channels. During Rydberg ev…
A five-panel figure measuring how the Rydberg state of strontium atoms decays. Panel (a) is a level diagram: a laser (Rabi frequency Ω) drives the metastable 3P0 state to the n = 61 Rydberg state, which decays either to states invisible to imaging ('dark', 85 µs) or to visible ones ('bright', 168 µs). Panels (b) and (c) measure these decays, with their pulse sequences as insets; panels (d) and (e) show the Rydberg drive pumping bright 3P2 atoms back, with lifetime 320/Ω² µs. It is Extended Data Fig. 2 of Scholl et al., Nature (2023). Bright decays are the ones that can be flagged as erasures. “Extended Data Fig. 2 — Extended Data Fig. 2 Rydberg lifetime.a, Pseudo-level diagram of the Rydberg dynamics and associated decay channels. During Rydberg evolution with Rabi…” by Scholl et al., www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06516-4, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
enc_gr · layer 2 Encoding · centrality 4.2 · demonstrated · since 2017 · updated 2026-09-26

Ground–Rydberg analogue qubit

A two-level qubit formed by an atomic ground state |g⟩ and a Rydberg state |r⟩, driven globally under an Ising-type Hamiltonian: the computational basis of analogue Rydberg simulators, not an error-suppressing code.

Verdict. Its ceiling is the black-body-limited Rydberg lifetime (~150 µs for Rb 70S at 300 K), but its working window is set by Doppler and laser-phase dephasing (T2* ≈ 5–6 µs), which caps Aquila programs at 4 µs. As of 2026-09-26 it has no memory and no code, and both vendors' gate-model lines use the hyperfine basis instead.

Key references

Ω = Rabi frequency; Δ = detuning; C6 = van der Waals coefficient; Rb = blockade radius; T2* = Ramsey dephasing time; T2echo = spin-echo coherence time; G1–G7 = the report's goal classes (see Actors & economics).

Identity & lineage

The qubit is a level pair inside one atom: |g⟩ in the 5S₁/₂ ground manifold and |r⟩ = |70S₁/₂⟩ in QuEra's ⁸⁷Rb machine Aquila, reached by a two-photon 420 nm + 1013 nm drive via 6P₃/₂ C[262]. "Encoding" names the computational basis of an analogue machine, not a code: the program is a Hamiltonian, the output a g/r pattern. The line starts with the 51-atom Harvard–MIT Ising-type simulator of 2017 D[384], co-authored by QuEra's CEO Alexander Keesling C[262]; Pasqal's architecture paper calls it the analogue level, "programming Hamiltonian sequences" C[385]. Attributes: natural carrier, nothing fabricated; no step time, control modality or placement of its own; loss and coherent errors.

Physics & limits

Aquila runs H(t) = (Ω/2)Σᵢ(e^{iφ}|gᵢ⟩⟨rᵢ| + h.c.) − ΔΣᵢnᵢ + Σ_{i<j} C6/|xᵢ−xⱼ|⁶ nᵢnⱼ, nᵢ = |rᵢ⟩⟨rᵢ|, with C6 = 5.42×10⁶ rad µm⁶ µs⁻¹ for 70S, |Ω| ≤ 15.8 rad/µs, |Δ| ≤ 125 rad/µs C[262]; Pulser uses the same convention for Pasqal's "ground-rydberg" basis C[386]. Blockade forbids two excitations within Rb = (C6/Ω)^{1/6} ≈ 8.4 µm at full drive S[262].

Three limits act on |r⟩. Decay: Rb 70S lives 410 µs at 0 K but 152 µs at 300 K (60S: 104 µs) S[387], black-body radiation carrying ~63% of the rate — the ceiling, and a loss channel. Doppler: for counter-propagating beams (k_eff ≈ 8.8 µm⁻¹) at 10 µK, a detuning spread σ ≈ 0.27 rad/µs gives a Ramsey 1/e time ≈ 5 µs S[262], matching the measured T2* = 4.5(1) µs D[388]. Phase noise and scattering: echo leaves T2 = 32(6) µs; T1 = 51(6) µs combines the 146 µs Rydberg lifetime with ~80 µs of 6P3/2 scattering D[388]. The 12.6(1) s hyperfine T2 of a Cs tweezer array D[138] does not apply: |r⟩ cannot be shelved, so there is no memory.

Engineering state of the art

table
Year Figure Who Tag+key
2017-07-13 51-atom programmable Ising-type model on g–r qubits Harvard/MIT D[384]
2018-05 g–r Rabi damping traced to several few-percent effects Browaeys–Lahaye group D[389]
2018-09 T2* 4.5(1) µs, T2echo 32(6) µs, Bell fidelity 0.97(3) Harvard/MIT D[388]
2023-06-20 Aquila: 256 sites, T2* 5.8 µs, T2echo 11.4 µs, 4 µs cap QuEra C[262]
2023-10-11 Sr g–r Bell fidelity ≥0.9971 after erasure excision Caltech D[143]
2024-10-21 (2+1)D string breaking, kagome array, local-detuning quench QuEra, Zoller, Lukin D[226]

The window has barely moved: T2* rose from 4.5 to 5.8 µs, and Aquila stops programs at 4 µs, the "approximate timescale of coherent evolution" C[262].

Manufacturing, materials & supply chain

Nothing is fabricated at this layer; fabrication sits in fab_optics. The demand is spectral: a Rydberg laser pair beside 780 nm tweezers C[262] whose phase noise, not power, sets coherence; the 2018 gain came from reference-cavity filtering (FWHM ≈ 2π × 500 kHz) and injection locking D[388]. A cold enclosure would move 70S from 152 µs toward 410 µs S[387]; the register profiles the commercial machines as room-temperature.

Control, readout & I/O burden

Aquila drives one global Ω(t), Δ(t), φ(t) set C[262], so drive I/O is flat in atom number; local detuning, the first site-resolved knob, drove the string-breaking quench D[226] and is promised for Pasqal's Vela R[390]. Readout is destructive imaging with an asymmetric budget — Rydberg read as ground 0.08, ground as Rydberg 0.01, filling error 0.007 C[262] — so r-populations are undercounted S[262]. At under 10 shots per second C[262], 10⁴ shots take over a quarter-hour.

Role in the stack

On the architecture "Neutral-atom analogue simulator (Rydberg arrays, lattice gases)" (atom_analog) the technology fills slot 2; slots 7–9 (code to interconnect) are empty. It requires an atom with a Rydberg level (alkali), provides the ground–Rydberg states g_rydanalog requires, and is replaced by enc_hf. Register machines: Aquila (primary, ✅), Fresnel / Fresnel 2 (primary, 🔎), Orion Alpha/Beta/Gamma (alternate, analogue mode on atom_rb, 🔎 inferred). Gate-model lines use enc_hf: QuEra's Gemini is a 260-qubit digital machine C[137]; the Harvard–MIT gate work encodes in |F=1,mF=0⟩, |F=2,mF=0⟩ and visits 53S1/2 only during gates D[391]; Pasqal drives a separate "digital" basis |g⟩,|h⟩ by Raman channel C[386]. The gap ledger stands: enc_hf does not describe analogue machines. Its atom_rb/atom_ae placement became atom_analog; the alkaline-earth variant D[143] has no register machine.

Evidence — how the numbers were measured

Gate benchmarks do not apply; the figures are T2*, echo T2, Rabi damping, blockaded-pair coherence and readout asymmetry. Aquila publishes all of them (Rabi 7.5 µs, blockaded Rabi 8.9 µs) C[262], none independently re-measured; beyond classical simulation, programs are checked against phase diagrams D[226]. Grades: Aquila ✅; Fresnel 🔎, the paper's abstract confirming only the analogue/digital split C[385]; Orion 🔎, its cited blog naming neither analogue mode nor encoding C[390] — Pulser's basis definition is better evidence.

Gemini's product page names ⁸⁷Rb and a digital mode, not the hyperfine pair; its placement under hyperfine encoding rests on the Harvard–MIT gate papers. The string-breaking abstract does not name Aquila; only QuEra's authorship points to it. Not published: the Rydberg level, T2* and echo time of Pasqal's Fresnel and Orion, on Pasqal's pages; and, in the Aquila text, the beam geometry assumed in the Doppler estimate and the F, mF sublevel of |g⟩ in analogue mode.

Actors & economics

Who.
Organisation Role Country What exactly they do with this technology Evidence
QuEra Computing developer US Aquila, 256-site g–r machine with public coherence budget C[262]
Pasqal developer France Fresnel; "ground-rydberg" basis in Pulser C[385]C[386]
Harvard/MIT (Lukin group) research US Origin of the g–r simulator and its coherence analysis D[384]D[388]
Caltech (Endres group) research US Strontium g–r qubit with erasure detection D[143]

Money. No dated financial item is specific to the ground–Rydberg encoding as of 2026-09-26.

Market & supply chain. Two commercial actors, both also selling gate-model machines; Pasqal lists five hosting clouds and five sites, mode unstated C[390]. Concentration sits in Rydberg lasers and cavities. Pays into G1.

IP & standards. No standard for analogue-qubit figures was found as of 2026-09-26; the shared Hamiltonian convention is the de facto interface C[262]C[386].

Roadmaps & track record. Pasqal (2026-01-29): Vela in 2026, over 256 qubits with local detuning; measurable quantum advantage before mid-2026 R[390] — not scored here. QuEra's next product is gate-model C[137].

Strategic reading. Scale without per-qubit control, code or storage, bounded by a few-microsecond window. If analogue results survive classical challenge, it keeps a G1 niche as a mode of digital machines; if not, both vendors already sell the hyperfine alternative.

Outlook & open questions

Confirm if by 2027-12-31 a commercial analogue machine publishes T2 above 20 µs; demote if Vela ships without coherence figures or no peer-reviewed analogue-advantage result appears by 2027-06-30. Open questions. (1) Why is Aquila's echo time a third of the 2018 value? (2) How does T2 scale with register size? (3) Will erasure-detecting alkaline-earth g–r qubits reach a product? (4) Which Rydberg level and coherence do Fresnel and Orion run? (5) Does the readout asymmetry bias published phase diagrams?

References
  1. [137] QuEra Computing Inc., “Gemini-Class Gate-Model Quantum Computer.” [Online]. Available: https://www.quera.com/gemini C
  2. [138] H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, “A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits,” Nature, vol. 647, pp. 60–67, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09641-4. arXiv:2403.12021. D
  3. [143] P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, “Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator,” Nature, vol. 622, p. 273, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06516-4. arXiv:2305.03406. D
  4. [226] D. González-Cuadra et al., “Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator,” Nature, vol. 642, no. 8067, pp. 321–326, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09051-6. D
  5. [262] J. Wurtz et al., “Aquila: QuEra's 256-qubit neutral-atom quantum computer,” arXiv:2306.11727, Jun. 2023. C
  6. [384] H. Bernien et al., “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,” Nature, vol. 551, pp. 579–584, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1038/nature24622. arXiv:1707.04344. D
  7. [385] L. Henriet et al., “Quantum computing with neutral atoms,” Quantum, vol. 4, Art. no. 327, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.22331/q-2020-09-21-327. arXiv:2006.12326. C
  8. [386] Pasqal (Pulser open-source project), “Conventions — Pulser 1.9.1 documentation,” Pulser documentation. [Online]. Available: https://pulser.readthedocs.io/en/stable/conventions.html C
  9. [387] I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V. M. Entin, “Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody-radiation-induced depopulation rates and effective lifetimes of Rydberg nS, nP, and nD alkali-metal atoms with n ≤ 80,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 79, no. 5, Art. no. 052504, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052504. arXiv:0810.0339. S
  10. [388] H. Levine et al., “High-fidelity control and entanglement of Rydberg-atom qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, no. 12, Art. no. 123603, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.123603. arXiv:1806.04682. D
  11. [389] S. de Léséleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, “Analysis of imperfections in the coherent optical excitation of single atoms to Rydberg states,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 97, no. 5, Art. no. 053803, May 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.053803. arXiv:1802.10424. D
  12. [390] L. Garbini, “Inside Pasqal's 2026 Vision on Quantum for Industry and Research,” Pasqal, Jan. 29, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pasqal.com/blog/inside-pasqals-2026-vision-on-quantum-for-industry-and-research/ R
  13. [391] S. J. Evered et al., “High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer,” Nature, vol. 622, no. 7982, pp. 268–272, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06481-y. arXiv:2304.05420. D