← Quantum Technology AtlasTechnologies · Machines · Architectures · OrganisationsРусскийעברית

metastable Yb-171 erasure array

Princeton (Thompson group)

metastable Yb-171 erasure array

Princeton (Thompson group) · neutral atoms · DEMONSTRATED (Jun 2026) · 20 physical qubits · access: lab-only

Register profile — the machine's variant of its architecture

qubit type: metastable Yb-171 ("omg") erasure-converted qubit - the only encoding in this register chosen so that errors announce themselves
gate mechanism: Rydberg-blockade CZ; 38(6)% of CZ errors detected as erasures
connectivity: tweezer array with AOD transport; ~50% of transport loss detected mid-circuit
control: SLM/AOD laser control
control placement: optics (room temperature)
readout: mid-circuit erasure check (20 us for Yb atoms)
gate evidence: no published figure
decoder mode: offline — syndromes decoded after the run
codes: stab_4_2_2, yb_erasure

Technologies by layer — the machine's cell per layer

1 Qubit carrier
Alkaline-earth(-like) atom (Yb/Sr) — erasure-native · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (storage/gate zones with metastable 171Yb qubits) ✅
metastable 171Yb ('omg') erasure-converted qubit in a tweezer array; lab-only
2 Encoding
Metastable ('omg') erasure encoding · primary ▣ Fig. 1 (3P0 qubit; leakage to 1S0 detected via 1P1 imaging) ✅
metastable 'omg' erasure encoding; unconditional decoding gain 1.9(4)× (post-selected 3.6(1)×)
3 Gate mechanism
Rydberg-blockade CZ · primary ▣ Fig. 2 (amplitude-robust CZ gates) ✅
Rydberg-blockade CZ; 38(6)% of CZ errors detected as erasures
4 Connectivity / transport
Atom transport by AOD tweezers (zoned architecture) · primary ▣ Fig. 1a,e (AOD coherent transport, polarization); §II Results ✅
AOD tweezer transport; ~50% of transport loss detected mid-circuit; teleportation fidelity 0.802(8)
5 Control
Laser + AOD/SLM optical control (atoms) · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (SLM static traps, orthogonal AODs, FPGA, 302 nm Rydberg beam); §II ✅
SLM/AOD laser control; room-temperature optics
6 Readout
Mid-circuit erasure check · primary ▣ Fig. 1a (EMCCD fast imaging); Fig. 3b, Fig. 4a (mid-circuit erasure checks) ✅
mid-circuit erasure check (20 µs for Yb atoms)
Fluorescence imaging of atom arrays · alternate ▣ Fig. 1 caption (fast 1P1 imaging of ground-state leakage) ✅
alternate technology; fluorescence imaging alongside the mid-circuit erasure check
7 Code
Erasure-adapted codes · primary ▣ Fig. 3 ([[4,2,2]] code); §III Discussion (surface-code threshold 0.94%→1.45%) ✅
[[4,2,2]] prep fidelity 0.874(4)→0.902(3) using erasure info; surface-code threshold 0.94%→1.45% at measured erasure fraction
8 Decoder
Correlated / loss-aware decoding (transversal, atom loss) · primary ▣ Fig. 3e (unconditional decoding with erasure information) ✅
erasure/loss-aware decoding, offline; unconditional decoding gain 1.9(4)×
9 Interconnect
— none — nothing in this layer ◌ 🔎
single apparatus; no interconnect
10 Manufacturing
Optical / mechanical assembly (lasers, vacuum, objectives) · primary ◌ 🔎
room-temperature optical/vacuum assembly (lasers, vacuum cell, objectives)

Standard records

acceptance fraction → 1 · best (the 1.9(4)x decoding gain is unconditional)
the post-selected 3.6(1)x is not the architecturally relevant number · Jun 2026 · source
leakage per gate → 0.38 · best (fraction of CZ errors converted to erasures)
threshold rises from 0.94% to 1.45% · Jun 2026 · source
evidence: ✅ 9 / 11

Pictures

Every picture carries the story of what it shows and its credit line.

Fig. 1 — Fig. 1: Overview of a fault-tolerant neutral atom quantum computer using erasure conversion.a Schematic of a neutral atom quantum computer, with a p…
Four-panel concept figure of a neutral-atom computer using erasure conversion. (a) A microscope objective above a plane of atoms; (b) ytterbium-171 levels: the qubit sits in the metastable 3P0 (F = 1/2) level, gates excite it to a Rydberg state, and most decays from there end in the ground state or, after ionization, in Yb+, where camera fluorescence flags them as erasures; (c) a surface-code patch with X and Z checks; (d) a syndrome circuit with erasure checks and fresh atoms from a reservoir. It is Fig. 1 of Wu, Kolkowitz, Puri and Thompson, Nature Communications (2022). It shows how a metastable qubit turns most gate errors into detectable erasures. “Fig. 1 — Fig. 1: Overview of a fault-tolerant neutral atom quantum computer using erasure conversion.a Schematic of a neutral atom quantum computer, with a plane of…” by Wu, Yue; Kolkowitz, Shimon; Puri, Shruti; Thompson, Jeff D., www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32094-6, CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)